NEWS-SPAN.ORG
Silence of the Goy Lambs in the Face of Jewish Supremacist Slaughter of the World
by Jung-Freud, Are goyim really this pathetic? The deafening silence amidst the slaughter in the hope that they may be spared by Jewish-Supremacist US Murder Machine? In the execrable movie THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, the lambs being slaughtered weren’t silent but crying out in horror. The ‘silence’ in the title signifies the yearning for inner peace by the lead character, Clarice Starling(Jodie Foster), haunted since childhood by the cries of defenseless animals. In our time, there aren’t many Clarices at the elite levels in the West(and the Non-West as well). So many people’s lives have been destroyed as the result of the Wars for Israel(or Neocon ventures or Clean Break Strategy), but few seem troubled by the horrors among the elites in the US, UK, Canada, EU, Australia, and the satellites of the West, be they Asian, Arab, African, or Latin American. Recently, there was Modi of India carousing with genocidal Netanyahu in Israel, pledging that his brand of Hindu Nationalism stands in solidarity with monstrous Zionism. Apparently, the moron doesn’t care about what the Western Empire once did to India. The goy elites of all these countries surely know about the death and destruction, especially beginning in the 1990s but speeding into overdrive in the 21st century, visited upon country after country, as the result of the Jewish domination of the West, the formula of which is Jews play cowboy and whites play horsey, but they’re hardly disturbed by the screams of the dying. (European ‘conscience’ has been to shut its eyes to the violence and mayhem visited on the Muslim world by Zio-US imperialism while opening its arms to the ‘refugees’ from war-torn countries, which is great for the Jews as they get to kill two birds with one stone, the Muslim world and the White world.) At the grassroots level, there are growing voices of concern but insufficient to apply meaningful pressure on the elites into changing their ways of bowing down at the feet of Zion. Video Link Furthermore, given the utter debasement of modern culture, many young ones, elite and mass, are too mired in diversions and degeneracies to muster any will for a better understanding of world affairs, which should matter because they are tax-paying citizens of the world empire gone evil. Consider. The most pressing ‘moral’ and ‘spiritual’ theme in the global-dominant West in the past 20 years has been the adoration of GloboHomo, celebration of sodomy, fetishization of the dildo(to the point where once respectable journals encourage women to ‘peg’ their male partners), and the sanctification of genital mutilation. (The very people who once expressed outrage over clitoris removal among certain African Muslims now vent their spleen over opposition to Tranny-Frankenstein or ‘Trankenstein’ medicine.) It’s either that or Negrolatry, the result of generations of conditioning of ‘white guilt’ via the Noble Negro myth, with MLK now the most venerated figure in US history(with second, third, and fourth all being black). Sympathy for the blacks given the American Experience is understandable, but the near-deification of the Negro body and soul has been downright obnoxious, culminating in the BLM riots of 2020 based on distorted reports surrounding George Floyd and utterly delusional panic about KKKops mowing down innocent black men across the US. In a nutshell, Western ‘morality’ has revolved around the celebration of sodomy(and tranny genital mutilation & clown-pronouns) and the canonization of blacks as innately nobler and holier than other races, both resulting in cultural decay and social decrepitude. Video Link The one bright spot was the most unexpected moral Black Swan event of protests for Gaza that were genuinely conscientious and spontaneous(than color-revolutionized by the cynical Deep State) and worldwide. But, if innumerable ‘Clarices’ were to be found among the masses in many countries, haunted by the cries of the dying and wounded in Gaza, it nevertheless turned out there were precious few among the elites who were similarly perturbed or willing to do anything about it. (It’s no wonder that the pro-Palestinian protests fizzled. For all the grassroots activism, there was virtually no one at the top to translate the mass energy into political action. Indeed, Democrats preferred to lose the election to Donald Trump than lend an ear to pro-Palestinian voices, and as a result, the Trump regime and the GOP went even further than the Democrats in handing everything demanded by Jewish supremacists on a silver platter.) The Deep State of the Jewish-controlled West and its non-white satrapies are either run by Hannibal Lecter or his fanboys. But surely, even Hannibal Lecter isn’t as sick as Netanyahu and other Jewish supremacist creeps. Lecter victimizes individuals to satiate his peccadilloes, whereas Netanyahu and his cohorts go after entire nations, partnered with Jewish supremacists in the US, e.g. Madeleine Albright with her infamous statement that it’s worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children by starvation and denial of medicine. In SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, Lecter is a supervillain, the kind you love to hate. Clearly psychopathic but also creative, witty, devious, and brilliant; because of his superior intelligence, the viewer is led into the Pop Nietzschean territory of the ubermensch who transcend the common morality of mediocrities and ‘losers’, which would be most of us. One part of the audience reviles him as a lunatic serial killer but another part admires him as a genius who makes and lives by his own rules and as such is freer than all of us. In the movie, the idea is that this monster might be half-way redeemed by summoning his considerable skills(as psychologist) in the capture of a far cruder serial killer known as ‘Buffalo Bill’. In a way, Lecter’s choice to cooperate may not entirely be self-serving. An elitist by nature, he may well be offended by the crudity of Bill’s methods and the clownishness of his motives. It’s like a connoisseur and a slob both feed on the flesh of dead animals, but the former does it with finesse whereas the latter gulps it down like a swine. Hannibal considers himself an artist whereas ‘Bill’ goes about like a carnie. Of course, the joke is really on law-abiding society as Lecter manipulates the privileges he is granted to break free and return to his old ways. And, with the even more execrable sequel HANNIBAL, Lecter was elevated to the status of a folk hero, with the audience laughing along while he dined on the brain parts of a federal officer. Video Link In a way, the progression of Lecterism uncannily parallels the progression of Jewish Power in the West. Surely, many white goyim noticed something a bit ‘extreme’, ‘pushy’, and ‘neurotic’ about the Jewish power-gamers, even suggestive of pathological and psychotic tendencies. But hey, they’re smart and made of money. Besides, there was the Holocaust Thing, so maybe a wise and tragic view of life undergirds their worldview. Then, by providing them with special privileges, they can do some good for the West, like Lecter solving the case of ‘Buffalo Bill’. So, how did things turn out? Jewish psychosis ran loose like Lecter, took over all the institutions, and employed the entire power apparatus of the US(and the West) toward committing mass murder around the world to satiate the bloodlust of Zion. Worse, just like Lecter became a full-blown folk hero with the sequel, the sheer awesomeness of Jewish smarts, bloodlust, and ruthlessness has captivated whole swaths of Western society(especially at the elite level) toward a kind of Jew-Worship. It’s gotten to the point where white cucks not only cheer on Zionist destruction of non-white nations but would dutifully submit to the Jewish slaughter of whites and Christians as well. “Oh mighty Jew, I’d be most flattered to offer up my race, even my family and myself, as human sacrifice to your unparalleled greatness.” The current world order is divided between Jews AND goyim, which is not to be confused with Jews VERSUS goyim because so many goyim side with the Jews even though Jewish supremacism looks upon all goyim, even those groveling at the feet of Jews, as dogs and cattle. At this point, the great white hope isn’t to be a white man standing tall and proud but to be a white horse that carries the Jewish cowboy. White cucks as the white horse don’t care if other goyim are slaughtered as pigs, cows, chickens, turkeys, goats, and lambs. Whites see Jews as the rightful master race and pray for Jews to favor whites as dogs and horses: As dogs to shepherd & threaten other animals into compliance with Zion and as horses to carry the Jewish masters on their backs. Whether Christo-Talmudism(aka Christian Zionism) or HBD’s worship of Jewish IQ, it has led to a mindless veneration of Jews as the holy, the awesome, the genius, and the ‘chosen’ to lord over the lesser humans. But of course, animals, even dogs and horses, don’t get to call the shots. When people abandon their dogs, the dogs end up in the pound to be euthanized. And horses, once old and useless, are turned into dog food or glue. Thus, dogs and horses are also ultimately sheep in Jewish eyes. In that sense, the world is made up of Jews as the master-race humans and everyone else as goy sheep(or goy lamb). And it is why the silence of the lambs in the current world order is so deafening. It’s not the kind of silence as meant in the movie, in which Clarice Starling heard the cries but tried to silence them in her mind. Instead, it’s the actual silence of most of the world in face of what the Jewish supremacists have wrought on yet another part of the world. It’s the silence of timidity, cravenness, cowardice, submission, amorality, opportunism, nihilism, and/or collaboration with evil. As for what’s been said, it’s usually worse than the silence, and desperate and disingenuous attempts to spin the USrael’s criminal attack as, in any shape or form, justified or necessary. Let’s consider some of these silences of the lambs, of the worthless goyim. If any political body should have been up in arms over the US-Israel’s vile and perfidious attack on Iran, it should have been the UN, which came into being for that very purpose. But we mostly heard silence, with even big hitters like Russia and China not proposing any meaningful motion against the aggression. What is the purpose of the UN if it cannot even come together in unity to condemn a clear case of war crime committed without justification(except for the fetid fantasies in the minds of Netanyahu and his ilk)? The UN has long been useless, but the silence in the current affair has exposed it as worse than useless. It’s a totally complicit and corrupt organization. But then, what hasn’t been corrupted by Jewish money and influence? While Russia is banned from global sports, Israel is allowed to participate in the Olympics despite its apartheid policies, endless aggressions, indiscriminate targeting of civilian, support for terrorism, and outright genocide in Gaza. The Nobel Peace prize? It went to some Venezuelan floozy who promised to hand her country on a silver platter to Zion and cheered on the invasion of her country by US imperialism. Just about everything ‘rules-based’ is about Jews making the rules for inferior goy animals who are expected to obey or else. When Jewish Power gets hold of free speech issues, it comes down to unfettered free speech for genocidal Zionists but suppression and canceling of ‘Anti-Semites’ who call out on Jewish Power and Zionist madness. The UN, which is located in Jewish-run New York, is useless, but then so is just about everything else. Take the Arab states that are Muslim just like Iran. They are not only silent about what the US and Israel, or USrael, did to Iran, but were complicit in the strike plan, all the while pretending to work for greater peace in the region. But then, most of these ‘leaders’ are descendants of hand-picked puppets of the Western Empire. They’re craven and vain materialists who shroud their rule with faux-legitimacy of Islamic piety and traditionalism when they’re really trashy and hedonistic playboys whose cultural identification is really with Las Vegas. The gangster state of Dubai is a perfect illustration of the marriage of pseudo-Islam and shallow globalism. As shameful as it is that Arab Muslims side with Zionists and the US against Iran, it isn’t all that surprising. After all, how are Arab cucks any different from white goy cucks? Both groups seem to have arrived at the conclusion that Jews are the awesome overlords of the world, therefore hoping to be in good graces with the Jewish Masters of the Universe once the dust settles. They want to be dogs and horses(or maybe cats and other pets) to the Jews than the lambs, chickens, pigs, and cows slated to be abused and slaughtered. Most of the goy competition around the world isn’t to be proud and principled as free humans. Rather, it’s to be the favored animals on the Animal Farm run by Jews as the Chosen-Master-Race. Now, take the EU. In the decades following World War II, a dominant narrative took hold in European nations that the Age of Empire had finally come to an end(and there was no reversing the tide for reasons both material and moral). While the West spread much that was good around the world, it also exploited the natives(even displacing millions via slave trades and forced labor projects) and plundered the resources, with minimal recompense. Also, given the imperialist aims of Germany and Japan during World War II and the anti-imperialist themes of the Cold War, with the US and the USSR accusing the other of the evils of ‘imperialism’, the international consensus seemed to be that imperialism was a thing of the past; and even if neo-imperialism existed here and there, it made an effort to seem mutually beneficial. Added to this was the elevation of the Holocaust as a kind of secular theology, its great lesson being the evils of racial supremacism, imperialist aggression, ruthless power-lust, and abnegation of even the most basic norms of humanity. But what we got from the EU on the criminal attack on Iran was mostly silence. It is the silence of the lambs as the Jewish design for white goyim is hardly different from the design for non-white goyim. The EU elites were deafening in their silence over the Gaza Genocide. And once again, following the attack on Iran(by the way, a second act of perfidy), all we get from the EU is either silence or, outrageously enough, endorsement of the aggression as supposedly the right of the US and Israel to ‘defend themselves’. So, what happened to all those hard-learned lessons about the evils of imperialism, the suffering of non-white natives abroad, the need for international laws, the primacy of diplomacy and negotiations over naked wars of aggression, and the moral rejection of chauvinistic militarism and racial supremacism? It’s as if the second half of the 20th century in Europe never happened. The rejection of the imperialist past, the wariness of racial supremacist attitudes, and the liberal-democratic will and humanist project to not only counter the totalitarianism of the Soviet Union but the neo-imperialist temptations of the US, especially in its policy against Cuba and its mass slaughter in Vietnam, as well as in meddling in other parts of the world, usually with dire consequences. It’s almost as if we’re back in the heyday of Western Imperialism, the 19th Century, with European elites incapable of any thought or action beyond the primacy of appeasing Jews. The US empire and ‘white’ Jews can do whatever they want, destroy any country via sanctions and subversion, and bomb and invade whatever region of the world for the sake of expanding Jewish Supremacist hegemony(and white cuck ‘prestige’ as the most indispensable enablers of the Jews — the only way trashy and stupid cucks like Lindsey Graham and Pete Hegseth can command roles in the current system is by barking like dogs in service to their Jewish Masters). Video Link What USrael did to Iran was no different from what Hitler’s Germany did to the Soviet Union. Actually, it’s worse. Whereas Germany was faced with a formidable power and potential threat to the east in the form of Stalin’s red empire, the US has nothing to fear from Iran. Even Israel’s supposed fear of Iran is bogus. It’s Israel that has all the nukes and brazenly carried out numerous terrorist attacks against Iranian scientists, engineers, generals, and even diplomats over the years. Iran isn’t a threat but a counter-threat because Israel has constantly threatened Iran with destruction, with the likes of the late Sheldon Adelson even suggesting that nukes be dropped on Iran to scare it into compliance. Such Jews have control over US white cuck politicians, and the US delivers whatever is ordered by Jews. Jews in Israel want to slaughter women and babies in Gaza? The US will send tons of bombs, even with the signatures of politicians and deep state goons. If Germany and Japan’s actions in World War II could partly be explained(if not justified) as survival tactics against bigger empires(that were warmongering in their own ways), no such justification can be made for USrael’s attack on Iran. Of course, the Empire of Lies will cook up any number of BS, and there always seems to be idiots and suckers in both political parties to swallow the nonsense, thus keeping the game going. The case of the EU is somewhat contradictory given the prevailing ideology in the West in the aftermath of World War II. Given Europe’s role, collaboration with, or lack of resistance to Nazi Germany’s crimes, Europeans made a special show of their attempts at atonement and redemption, with intellectuals and the public opinion turning against the last ditch efforts to cling to empire, thereby dooming the last vestiges of British, French, and Dutch imperialism. Europeans also decried American hegemony as a new kind of imperialism, especially in the charnel house that became the Vietnam War. And over time, the European left began to cut ties with the Soviet Union, showcasing its version of social-democracy as more humane and freedom-oriented than the totalitarian model of Moscow. Thus, Europe came to represent a new path for humanity, one devoid of old chauvinism(related to imperialism) and independent of both US neo-imperialism(or hegemonism) and Soviet totalitarianism. Despite its steep decline in military power vis-a-vis the two superpowers in the Cold War, Europe more than held its own in terms of the arts, culture, humanist values, and intellectual critique of world affairs. Though aligned with the US via the NATO alliance, Europeans could be just as scathing in their rebuke of US arrogance as of Soviet repression. It was a period of leftist intellectual/cultural predominance given the discrediting of the right, justified or not, in relation to the crimes of Nazi Germany and Fascism. But over time, the great crimes of radical leftist regimes also came to light — Stalinism, Maoism, and the Khmer Rouge especially — , and the European Left lost its luster, made worse by the excesses of the radical 60s generation that spawned Baader Meinhof and the Red Brigade degenerated into nihilistic violence. Video Link With the Right indefinitely defanged and rendered defensive as the result of the World War II narrative and the Left increasingly delegitimized as the result of revelations of communist crimes and radical excesses(and of course the collapse of the Soviet Union where Gorbachev made the final and futile effort to salvage what remained of Marxism-Leninism and the shift in China from Maoism to market economics), Europeans were left without a meaningful sense of ideological bearing, and this void was filled by the triumphal vision of End of History pushed by the US as the last remaining hegemon, with the Soviet Union out of the picture and with China having accepted a subservient role as the factory for goods to be consumed mostly in the affluent West. Thus, generation after generation, European ‘leaders’ became ideological clones of American Triumphalism. No less important was that the end of the Cold War coincided with the Jewish takeover of the US(and consequently the West and the entire world). Increasingly, Europeans abandoned a sense of ideological and cultural independence from the US. Furthermore, if Europeans had been confident in standing up to Anglo-America or Yankee dominance, they were nervous about calling out the increasingly Jewish factor in the American global agenda lest they be accused of ‘antisemitism’. Then, it was only a matter of time before the newer elites of Europe would all be groomed and selected on the basis of abject obeisance to Jewish Power, a mirror reflection of what happened in the US earlier. In a way, Europeans were even less resistant to Jewish Power due to the cult of Holocaust Guilt and the narrative of ‘antisemitism’ as having been essentially a Christo-European sin. So, when certain European nations opposed the US plan for the Iraq War, they focused on Dubya the dumb cowboy than the Jewish Neocons who surrounded him. And if Europeans have gripes about the current American administration, they will name Trump but not the Jews who pull his strings and lead him by the nose. Video Link In the ideological void from the delegitimization of both the Right and the Left, the European counterparts of American Neocons took center stage, perhaps best exemplified by the Zionist fraud Bernard-Henri Lévy and goy-cuck Jew-worshipers like Andrew Roberts and Niall Ferguson whose idea of new and reformed ‘conservatism’ was to support Israel unconditionally and argue for US hegemony as a necessary kind of ‘good’ imperialism, the only bulwark against revanchist Russia, resurgent China, and ‘terrorist’ Iran. As for the so-called Left, it fractured into various identity politics that degenerated into a clown show via the sex-obsessed ideology that hair-split the two sexes into fifty ‘genders’(and counting) and the idolatry of the Negro as jungle jesus and sexual liberator of frigid whites. But behind all the morass and confusion, the one constant has been the Jewish control of the white soul(now utterly lacking in autonomy and agency). It explains why Europe can be simultaneously ‘far left’ and ‘far right’. In the current paradigm, stuff like GloboHomo, mass immigration(and the great replacement), anti-white propaganda, emasculation, and ‘slut feminism’ are deemed as ‘leftist’ or even ‘far left’(which would have surprised leftists of old who would have decried them as products of capitalist decadence). Europeans have been indoctrinated that such ‘leftism’ is the only bulwark against evils such as Nazism and Soviet totalitarianism and of course ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’. Forget about the nation-state or ethno-nationalism and just welcome tons of nonwhite immigrants. Suppress white identity and interests in favor of what can be done for nonwhite migrants who represent the future of Europe. Yet, these same Europeans have been led to support the Jewish-Nazi alliance in Kiev, idolize the truly far-right elements in Ukraine, pledge absolute support for the ultra-right ethno-supremacist state of Israel(and its genocide against Palestinians), and cheer on USrael’s mass slaughter of brown people in Iran(and earlier in Libya and Syria). Just think. Europeans in Europe itself are afraid to offend the sensitivities of Arabs, Muslims, Africans, and other nonwhites. Indeed, anyone is summarily arrested and fined for espousing nationalist sentiments in many parts of Europe. Yet, these very Europeans are okay with the US and Israel indiscriminately bombing and slaughtering ‘brown’ people as a bunch of subhuman ‘darkies’ and ‘wogs’ all across the Middle East and North Africa. So, the British dare not call out the Pakistani grooming gangs that raped white girls, but they may cheer on the bombing of Iran and the mayhem against thousands of civilians, including women and babies. The only way such an ‘ideological’ contradiction makes any sense is by naming the Jewish Factor. The only truly operative program in the West is “If Jews want it, they get it.” It’s no different in the US where championing free speech has come to mean, “Jews get to decide what ‘free speech’ is.” Carrie Prejean Boller surely found out what ‘religious liberty’ means. It means Jews dictate what is what whereas white Christian goyim meekly listen and take heed. Jews get to think and decide, whites get to listen and obey, and it’s the same from the US to the EU(and the UK, for which Brexit proved to be utterly useless). It’s the only logical explanation as to why Europeans are apologetic and accommodating to Arab and/or Muslim immigrants/migrants/refugees in the EU & UK but brazen in their support of Zionist mass murder across the Middle East. Thus, Jewish Power gets to kill two birds with one stone via their global/foreign policy. They use white/European support to destroy the nonwhite rivals and potential enemies of Zionist Imperialism in the Middle East & North Africa but then also use the migrant crisis and mass immigration into Europe to destroy white goyim. It’s so obvious, but the haplessness of whites in the face of this outrage speaks volumes about how low the white race has fallen. At the very least, if whites hated Jewish-Zionists globalists for pushing White Nakba, they would retain the pride of rage. Slaves may lack the means to overthrow their master, but their hatred would at least be a sign of independent thought and emotions, i.e. they know they’re slaves being oppressed. In contrast, the white cucks of Europe are like the slaves who’ve internalized their lowly condition as cosmically just, much like the lower castes in India having accepted that their roles were ordained by karma and the gods. Whites/Europeans have accepted their ‘untouchable’ status vis-a-vis the Jews who occupy the status of neo-Brahmins lording over whites/Europeans whose race, culture, and history have supposedly been stained by the sin of ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’. If so, shouldn’t whites make amends by condemning and opposing ‘racism’, supremacism, and imperialism everywhere? Moral logic would lead to such a conclusion, but the very whites who moan and groan about their sinful past are happy to support Jewish supremacism, Zionist genocide against Palestinians, and endless imperialist wars for Jewish globalists. Video Link The main reason as to why Western ‘leaders’ have become so utterly worthless over the years owes to the key criterion for vetting and promotion, which is a mindless obeisance to Zion. Thus, it’s difficult for anyone of integrity and honor to rise in a system geared to favor the craven and/or devious. As a result, the EU is composed of clever people who are utterly devious & opportunistic and stupid people who childishly swallow everything that Jews and their chosen cuck-lords feed them. It’s smarts without scruples and stupidity without scrutiny. How else did someone as stupid as Kaja Kallas rise so high in the EU(or someone as idiotic as Pete Hegseth in the US)? But, there’s also the cultural degeneracy and intellectual deterioration in general, so much so that even genuinely smart and sensible people have espoused GloboHomo as a ‘moral’/‘spiritual’ crusade and endless immigration as a formula for a brighter future for mankind. Video Link The West used to lead in just about every field, but it hasn’t been so for some time, with its ‘right’ represented by the ultra-capitalist cult of ‘greed is good’ and kneejerk support for Zionism and with its ‘left’ represented mainly by GloboHomo and Negrolatry. Given the legacy of Western dominance, not only economically and militarily but in fields of arts, culture, and philosophy, there are still many in Eastern Europe & Russia and the Non-West that remain captivated by the Western Brand. There usually seems to be a lag between the decline and stature. Even after the fall of Rome, the various Germanic Tribes strove to be the new torchbearer of Roman glory, which had become such that its prestige outlived its extinction. Likewise, the ascendant bourgeoisie often imitated or intermarried with the aristocracy that, though doomed by history, held a certain aura of nobility. Being American means never having to say you’re sorry for being stupid The serious side of Western ideas and culture has been either neglected, forgotten, or deconstructed into fragments of self-doubt. Over the years, the West has largely been defined by American academia, media, and entertainment, all of which came under the control of Jews of various stripes: Frankfurt School, Neoconservatism, Zionism, GloboHomo, Negrolatry(inconceivable without Jewish input, funding, and encouragement), Feminism as anti-white-ism(as its main theme has been to warn white girls of the threat from white male date-rapists) or New Feminism as ‘slut pride’, whereby white girls are encouraged to bare themselves on OnlyFans(and other Jewish-techno-pimp-run porn sites) and debase themselves. What is one of the main themes of Anti-Iranian propaganda? Iranian women must be ‘liberated’ so that they too can emulate white, yellow, brown, and black skanks in the West in slutty exhibitions and GloboHomo celebrations. It’s a sure sign of the degradation of the West, but its dominance has been so total and so prolonged that countless idiots around the world remain entranced with what is ‘labeled’ as ‘Western’, and this despite all the various ‘leftist’ studies on ‘anti-imperialism’ and ‘de-colonization’. How ironic that so many nonwhites who claim to struggle for ‘de-colonization’ have fallen under the spell of GloboHomo, a totally Western concoction of ultra-supremacist and hyper-imperialist Zionist Jews. To Jewish supremacists, both Arabs/Muslims and European goyim are sheep. Even if allowed spared from slaughter, they are less-than-human. If Zion can help it, the survival and well-being of certain goyim should be a matter of whim for the superior Jews. Just like God decides who should live or die, Jewish Supremacists want the power of thumbs up or thumbs down on the various goyim. Goyim who defy the Jews get the stick, and goyim who submit to the Jews get the carrots. Video Link The silence of the lambs in the white world and the Arab world is revealing as to how much they’ve succumbed to the almighty power of the Jews. White elites in the US, UK, and EU are like dogs climbing over one another to be in good graces with the Jews. What have the political parties in the UK done but compete for Jewish money and approval? What do white elites do in the two political parties in the US but fall all over each other to gain favors of the Jews as the god-race? Dogs or lambs, it’s the same difference as dogs and sheep interact to keep the herd under the control of humans. White goyim may flatter themselves as the indispensable dogs of the Jewish Master to keep the other goy sheep in order, but they’re also just animals without agency. Tragically, the white and Arab figures/movements that pushed back against Jewish supremacism proved to be reckless, stupid, or vile in their own ways. National Socialist Germany had a great opportunity to lead all of Europe against Anglo-Zionist hegemony, but Hitler had supremacist convictions of his own that led to defeat and disgrace for the entire European right, which remains morally and historically defensive. As for Arab leaders like Nasser, Sadat, (Saddam)Hussein, Gaddafi, and Assad, they turned out to be inept, devious, murderous, or foolish. Nasser never got it together, Sadat sold out the Arab world for U.S. aid, Hussein was a bloody tyrant(who recklessly involved himself in unwinnable wars), Gaddafi trusted the Western gangsters(doing the bidding of Zion), and Assad proved to be weak and ineffective. Once they passed from history, the entire Arab world, minus the resistance among the Palestinians-Lebanese-Yemenese, turned into one vast desert of cuckdom. Prior to the so-called ‘Clean Break Strategy’, the Arab World was roughly divided between the cuck-sheeple of the Zio-US empire, led by Saudi Arabia and post-Nasser Egypt, and the resistance block, which however made a mess of things as its members could never get things in order, made worse by the fact that both Syria and Iraq were ruled by religious-ethnic minorities, leading to much paranoia, repression, and opportunities for outside subversion. (Iran, where the dominant Persians make up 50% of the population, has been more stable.) With the downfall of most of the resistance Arabs, virtually the entire Arab World is now made up of sheeple at the mercy of the Zionist-US empire. At one time, the Saudis and Gulf States relied on US protection from independent Arab powers like Hussein’s Iraq, but with the fading of Arab independence throughout the region, the US presence is more like a protection racket. After all, what do Arab cucks have most to fear? Israel, not Iran. So, the US remains in the Arab World to ‘protect’ it from the imperialist designs of Zion, but of course the whole thing is a sham as the ultimate goal of the US is to soften up the Arab World for more Zionist penetration and hegemony. Arabs desperately think the Zio-US empire will go easy on them if they join in the war on Iran, but it’s just Arab idiocy as usual. Cucks will cuck, but the real tragedy of the Arab World was that there were several genuine independent and defiant states that squandered their opportunities and were toppled one-by-one by the Zio-US empire. The Age of Empire might have truly ended if not for the US. Once the non-Western colonies began to rise up, there was only so much the European imperialists could do to keep things under control. And once they lost their colonies, they weren’t sufficiently large and resource-rich to revive their global ambitions. Indeed, their very need for empire had been due to the lack of raw materials. Neo-imperialism took off with American Power. Unlike European countries like France and Britain, the US was large enough in population and bountiful in raw materials to build up military power to threaten and dominate the world. But then, its autonomous might and security even without an empire meant there was no need for one. Some may argue that the communist threat forced the US into neo-imperialist or counter-imperialist mode against the Red Menace, but others would argue that the US would have opted for world domination just the same because of its political and cultural DNA, the cowboy spirit, missionary zeal(later secularized), and thirst for piracy. The US pulled off what European powers were no longer able to do. It created a vast empire, even bigger than the British Empire, but under the ruse of the ‘rules-based order’. As Theodore Roosevelt said, the US could speak softly but carry a big stick. The US empire maintained the trappings of national sovereignty around the world but employed all manner of means, covert and overt, to install compliant regimes and remove non-compliant ones. Outwardly, the pro-American Arab states are independent and sovereign, but if you scratch the surface, what Chuck Schumer said of the Deep State in relation to Donald Trump comes to mind: “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. He’s being really dumb to do this.” Of course, that ‘intelligence community’ is the set of neo-imperialist networks, and it has artfully weaponized ‘democratization’ to spread the tentacles of American control all over the world. Democratization was sold as a bill of goods by which countries around the world could be free and independent, especially by using the ballot to get rid of dictators, not least the puppets of the US. However, democratization or liberalization rendered those countries far more permeable and penetrable to outside forces, of which the US empire had by far the biggest purse and the most guns. Via democratization, the US could help the people replace their dictatorial puppet of the US with a ‘democratic’ puppet of the US. Take the Philippines since the fall of Marcos. Not that the rejection of ‘democratization’ or ‘liberal’ freedoms necessarily resulted in hostility from the empire. After all, the Sunni monarchies of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States had long been theocratic and repressive, but they were among the biggest(and most secure) flunkies of the US empire. By propping up weak rulers with questionable legitimacy with business opportunities and ‘protection’, the US has kept much of the Arab world under lock and key. Had the US remained under the control of Anglo-Americans or WASPs, the arrangement might not have been such a bad deal. But as the US is now the instrument of Jewish-Zionist supremacism with considerable appetite for the Greater Israel Project, the Arab cuck-rulers must be shitting bricks. Will the Zio-US empire indefinitely protect the Arab/Gulf states from Zionist expansionism or soften them up for total Jewish hegemony? Now, let’s consider the sheep in Russia and China. While Russia and China have far more leverage than the rest of the world in dealing with the Zio-US empire, they too are regarded as sheep or animals by World Jewry and, rather embarrassingly, they act like sheep, usually cowering before American power. On some level, they must understand that American Neo-Imperialism owes to a combination of Jewish wit-and-will and White smarts-and-skill. Jews on their own wouldn’t amount to much as they simply lack the numbers for global control. But with whites at their side as the managerial class and marching warriors, the Jewish overlords have the formula for global control. While white Americans minus the Jews have the numbers and ability for global domination, they tend not to be as tenacious, persistent, vindictive, and contemptuous. There’s a side to White Americanism that goes for live-and-let-live and let-bygones-be-bygones. Not so with the Jewish Supremacists who, once they lock on an objective, never give up and work intensely but also patiently to bring it about in their plan of total domination. Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz got their Iraq War, Victorian Nuland got her Ukraine War, and Netanyahu(and the entire cabal) got their Iran War. Jewish Power is like a python that bites and refuses to let go, winding around its victim and step-by-step squeezing out every last ounce of breath inside. Russia found out the hard way through the endless game of NATO encirclements and Ukraine provocations that the Jews will never give up in their grand plan to restore Russia of the 1990s when Jewish oligarchs held most of the cards. By hook and by crook, they are going to try to take over Russia like they took over the US, UK, and EU(and Canada and Australia). And once Russia is taken out of the picture, Jewish Power will put the squeeze on China, and white cucks will just go along because they are so smitten with Jews as the rightful master race: The richest, the smartest, the pushiest, and the ‘chosen’ by God. Would the West be as incessantly aggressive, subversive, and hostile against Russia(and China) if not for the Jewish factor? It’s doubtful. An Anglo-American-led US empire would seek dominance but also compromise and accommodation, much like the one worked out between the British Empire and the French Empire. Indeed, the relative lack of autonomous Anglo aggression/ambition is evident from the current realities in the UK, Australia, Canada, and the US. Anglos in their very ancient homeland of Britain have been defenseless against endless immigration that has resulted in Asian-Indians owning the most property in London, Pakistani rape gangs abusing white girls, and black Africans/Jamaicans routinely beating up whites and colonizing white wombs. It’s hardly different in Australia and Canada where Anglo cucks revile any sense of white identity/interests and celebrate Diversity under the watchful eye of their Jewish Masters who insist on White Nakba. If Anglos and whites in general are so wussy and appeasing of the Cult of Diversity, it’s highly doubtful that the most aggressive component of current Western neo-imperialism is Anglo chauvinism or white supremacism. After all, if whites are so confidently supremacist abroad, why are they so haplessly apologetic and defensive in their home countries? No, the common link within current Western Imperialism is Zionism as Jewish worldview comports with the Jewish nationalist view. Jews aggressively seek global domination and Jews aggressively seek the total erasure of Palestinians, i.e. how Jews see and treat Palestinians is virtually the same as how they see and treat goyim around the world, be they Russians or Iranians… or Western whites as they too have been targeted ideologically with anti-white propaganda(and endless accusations of ‘antisemitism’ for the slightest infraction against the Jewish agenda) and targeted demographically with mass immigration(or the Great Replacement). Video Link Given that Palestinians are Arabs, Israelis have humiliated the Arab World time and time again, the West has favored Jews over Arabs, and the Arabs have long experienced the machinations of Western imperialism, one would think most Arabs would stand in solidarity with the Iranians(and of course the Palestinians). But the world doesn’t operate on morality, pride, and principles. In every country, there are flunkies willing to sell out national sovereignty and independence for personal privilege even if it means serving as satrapies to the empire. To a degree, such an attitude isn’t always ignoble, or entirely ignoble, given the failures, betrayals, brutality, and even madness that sometimes characterized sovereign states. After all, can anyone blame the collaborationist Chinese in Hong Kong and Singapore when Mao Zedong plunged China into throes of lunacy in the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, a time when even those who’d worked alongside Mao all their lives in service to revolution were thrown to unhinged mobs? Given Saddam Hussein’s nonstop parade of idiocies — starting a war with Iran, mass-slaughtering Kurds, invading Kuwait, etc. — , one can sort of understand why the Arab sheiks opted for protection under the US empire. And what did North Korea do but squander its pride of sovereignty with the piggish aggrandizement of the Kim Dynasty? To many individuals, it wasn’t a choice between slavery under the empire vs freedom under sovereignty but sweet slavery under the empire vs bitter slavery under sovereignty as the rulers of many independent states turned out to be either brutal/repressive and/or corrupt. Even the uncorrupt ones could be plenty mad, culminating in the total madness, as with the Khmer Rouge, a regime so reckless and crazy that fellow communist Vietnam took action to expunge it from the scene. True, the hardships faced by many sovereign states owed to sanctions by the US superpower. Another reason was the failed Marxist-Leninist model adopted by leftist Third World states that suppressed economic incentives. The end of the Cold War signaled that the entire world was ready to acknowledge the Western capitalist model as superior; indeed, in the last decade of the Cold War, once-Maoist China was transitioning to a market economy modeled on East Asian ‘tiger’ success stories. But over time, things didn’t pan out as many hoped because US capitalism increasingly drifted back to an imperial mode in the absence of another superpower to counter it ideologically and militarily, a role played by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Thus, the US that had presented itself as a new kind of anti-imperialist empire of hope and freedom, one that rejected European imperialism and Soviet totalitarianism, increasingly grew arrogant and chauvinistic in its attitude toward the world. What had been unthinkable began to happen. The US, with the full backing of EU stooges, destroyed one government after another in North Africa and the Middle East. Naked imperialism once again became the norm, and even Western ‘progressives’ hardly protested, cackling along with Hillary Clinton at the destruction of Libya and spewing propaganda for the Deep State in the war against Syria(as Rachel Maddow did incessantly). There was once a time when the liberal and leftist-leaning media of the US(and even more so in Europe) sympathized with, say, the Sandinistas in Nicaragua who overthrew the corrupt Somoza puppet regime, but that’s hardly been the case for quite a while. The last Latin American leader with some measure of progressive support was Hugo Chavez, perhaps because he loved to bash the idiot George W. Bush, whom just-as-idiotic progressives convinced themselves was hard-at-work in transforming the US into a Christo-Fascist totalitarian state, LOL. Through the Obama years, Trump’s first term, the Biden years, and Trump’s second term, there’s been hardly any ‘progressive’ opposition to naked US imperialism in Latin America, covert operations to subvert countries, deep state machinations to replace leaders, and even the very overt toppling of Maduro. If anything, the few times the Democrats gave Trump standing ovations during the State of the Union speech were when he shook his fist at relatively sovereign nonwhite countries that were hit with sanctions and threatened with bombings and invasion. When Trump threatened to bomb Iran to smithereens, virtually all the Democratic politicians stood up with the Republican ones. Even when Trump’s perfidious attack on Iran began, there was hardly any vocal opposition from the so-called ‘progressives’, most of whom had endorsed the provocative meddling in Ukraine. Even though Francis Fukuyama was considered as center-right or moderate conservative, his End-of-History has also been imbibed by the supposed ‘left’ that believes no less that the entire world must be remade in the image of ‘liberal West’, by which they mean mandatory celebrations of GloboHomo and dogmatic catechisms of Negrolatry. It’s no wonder that the favored mascot of the Deep State as a means to garner the loyalty of ‘progressives’ in the Ukraine War was some guy larping as a ‘tranny’: “If we defeat Russia, Ukraine can be a very ‘gay’ place, and then it’s only a matter of time before the ‘gay rainbow’ marches on Moscow itself.” Anyway, for a time much of the world could be sold the bill of goods that semi-sovereignty under the US empire was preferable to absolute sovereignty under a brutal tyrant, e.g. South Korea over North Korea. While South Korea was clearly a kind of puppet and whore of the US empire, didn’t it produce far more tangible gains than the hermit kingdom of North Korea, even to the point where China and Russia were more willing to deal with the South than the North? Didn’t Chile do better(by ousting the quasi-Marxist president) than communist Cuba that, though relatively more independent, had a moribund economy sustained by subsidies from the Soviet Union? If you were Chinese, would you rather live in Hong Kong/Singapore/Taiwan or Mao’s China? If you were an Arab, would you rather live under Saudi oil sheiks or under Saddam Hussein with this Stalinist antics? In the ideological discourse on imperialism, there was a tendency, understandable but flawed, that laid all the blame for the harsh conditions in the Non-West at the feet of Western Imperialists, ignoring the fact that the human condition everywhere had been pretty grim with its own share of tyrants, madmen, and corrupt snakes. And communism’s war on greed and exploitation didn’t exactly pan out as hoped because self-interest, shaped by national character and bound by the rule of law, is the key to any kind of economic activity. Video Link But the American pitch of its enlightened new empire of freedom and opportunity has reached its expiration date. There are several reasons for this. One is that there are now viable alternatives. When the main ideological rival of the US was Soviet communism, it was only a matter of time before capitalism would outpace its rival. Contra Khrushchev’s prophecy of “We will bury you”, the opposite happened. Communism was invaluable in a way for Russia and China in the development of wholly independent and sovereign systems of power, but it wasn’t a workable economic model for long. In time, Russia and China moved away from communism, and their economies began to grow, even rapidly at times. Also, they rejected the late ‘liberal Western’ model, which, by the way, grew increasingly illiberal and censorious with its mandatory ‘gender ideology’, idolatry of the Negro, and quasi-religious worship of Jews. Russia and China showed that a country can grow in power and wealth without adopting the full package of the ‘liberal western’ model. The wide-ranging implication is that even if countries around the world don’t adopt the Russian or Chinese model, they nevertheless know that a country can be fully or mostly sovereign(in rejection of the ‘Western’ model) and still make great progress in key fields. This has complicated the one-size-fits-all End of History formulation. Another reason is the mostly unspoken but widely understood consensus that the US-led Western order is less about ‘liberal democracy’ and ‘free markets’ than tribal-supremacy(of the Jews) and economic gangsterism(for the Jews). It used to be argued that the glory of capitalism is that it believes in the cultivation of business regardless of race, culture, creed, religion, or whatever. Anyone who wants to do business is welcome. As every side has something to sell and something to buy, capitalism brings the world together in constructive engagement, mutual benefit, and purposeful interdependence. As things turned out, the so-called ‘free markets’ could be totally weaponized by the Jewish-run West to favor those who suck up to Zio-US power and to destroy those who don’t. So much for the ‘invisible hand’, which in practice is visibly Jewish Supremacist, Zionist, and neo-imperialist. In the US, you can boycott any nation and even any US state based on your moral conscience or political leaning, but you CANNOT boycott Israel. So-called US ‘free markets’ provides freebies to Israel while depriving defiant countries of even the opportunity to compete in the global marketplace. We have ‘conservative’ Jewish voices denouncing ‘socialism’ and ‘statism’ while also demanding that the US(and EU) shower Israel with free money and endless gifts and tributes to keep it artificially afloat. Not only ‘free markets’ but ‘democracy’ has been weaponized. Whenever the Jewish-run West promotes ‘democracy’ in any part of the world, it is to infiltrate and set up puppet regimes. Things have gotten so decrepit that the US engineered a coup in Ukraine to topple a democratically elected president and then replaced him with a series of puppets who were said to be the face of ‘democracy’. Subscribe to New Columns Even though the US always favored Jews over Arabs/Muslims, the Anglo-American government at least restrained the most obnoxious Zionist demands, but the currently Jewish-run US is Zionism-all-the-way, no matter how outrageous the Jewish behavior. White American elites became nervous about Jews pointing to past instances of Anglo-American restraints on Zionism as proof of ‘antisemitism’ and therefore doubled down on their utter cuckery to all-things-Jewish-and-Zionist. That in essence became the template for the Jewish-White relations once Jews established total control beginning with the Clinton administration: Whites would suck Jewish cock so hard in perpetuity that Jews would withhold their reminder of the ‘Anti-Semitic’ white refusal to do so in the past. The EU and most of the Arab World are mostly cucked and useless, but what about East Asia? If any nation has reasons to call out the US in the latest attack, it is Japan. After all, the US denounced Japan’s sneak attack on Pearl Harbor as an act of ‘infamy’, so unforgivable that the US earned the moral right to demand unconditional surrender and to commit mass-slaughter of over a million Japanese civilians to bring it about, including the nuking of two Japanese cities(with ten or twelve more designated targets lest the Japanese government be unwilling to submit to America’s will). Also, the US occupation forced on Japan an eternal denunciation of war-making as part of the ‘peace constitution’. And many Japanese, especially on the Left, took those imposed ideals to heart, i.e. Japan had much to answer for in its imperialist warmongering and crimes against humanity. That is precisely why so many Japanese protested America’s use of Japan as a military base to threaten China and its involvement in the Vietnam War with near-genocidal results. Idealistic Japanese were outraged by America’s own betrayal of what it had imposed on Japan. The US justified its war crimes against Japan on the basis of Japan having been beyond the pale and evil-militarist, but the US was propping up its own empire at the cost of millions of lives. But look around today, and there’s hardly any sign of protest among the Japanese over what the US has done to Iran, not once but twice in cahoots with racial supremacist and genocidal Israel that is as vile as Japanese Imperialism at its worst. Indeed, the US war crimes against Iran far exceed what Japan did at Pearl Harbor. Japan, after all, didn’t take out the political and military leadership in Washington. Also, Japan’s fear of America’s presence in the Asian Pacific was real and rational as the US, no less than Japan and European powers, had played the imperialist game in Asia, especially with its own record of abuses in the Philippines. In contrast, the attack on Iran had absolutely nothing to do with American security, that is unless America is conceptualized as a political colony of Zion. At most, Iran posed a counter-threat to Israel’s hegemonic ambitions throughout the region, which resulted in political chaos and destruction of millions of lives across Iraq-Libya-Syria; besides, Israel developed nukes with stolen US technology and aimed them at Iran whereas Iran never developed the Bomb. So, the attack on Iran was all about appeasing Jewish supremacism, rather ironic since we’ve been told endlessly that the appeasement of the Nazi regime at Munich was an unforgivable sin of history. Appeasing Jewish monstrosity and murderous bloodlust is what the US is all about. The American war of aggression against Iran is an absolute betrayal of what the US imposed on Japan, morally and legalistically; so, why the deafening silence of the lambs among the Japanese? US action should be an affront to both the Japanese Right and the Japanese Left. As for the Japanese Left, why isn’t it demanding the removal of all US military forces in Japan when the US is motivated by racial supremacism and imperialist hubris, the kind that once infected Japanese minds. In the American case, it’s actually worse because, whereas the Japanese desperately needed an empire to shore up its great power status in a world of rival imperialists, the US has all the resources it needs and has the most secure geography in the world. Perhaps, part of the reason for the long apathy beginning in the 1970s was that Japanese idealism became co-opted by radical ideologies of the Sixties. Instead of merely protesting American neo-imperialism in Vietnam, the Japanese Left adopted various forms of lunatic ideologies, such as Maoism and those committed to terrorism as nihilistic kicks. As such, anti-American critique became conflated with the most lunatic elements of the Left, and so, the Sixties generation of Japan grew ashamed of their past associations and just focused on being Economic Animals. The moral result for the whole of society has been no less dire. Soulless and hollow, only motivated by profits and pleasures, willing to aid and abet American evil if of economic benefit. Korea is also a disgrace, another case of silent lambs. Given that its dominant narrative of the 20th century has revolved around colonization by the Japanese, one would think Koreans would be especially outraged by the colonization of Palestine by the Jews(who’ve treated the Palestinians worse than the Japanese treated the Koreans). But, the idiotic Christian community in Korea are quasi-Scofieldites whose main historical reference is to the Old Testament(even to the neglect of their own national history and culture). Single-minded in their dogma, they believe it’s God’s will that Jews do whatever they please to the Palestinians, or Amalek. Furthermore, like most of East Asia, Koreans care more for status than just about anything else, even national identity. If most Koreans had to betray their own country for higher status, they would do so in a heartbeat. So, even if secular/educated Koreans may acknowledge the plight of the Palestinians(with parallels to the Korean experience under the Japanese), the fact remains that they are awed by Jews as the biggest winners in the world and dismissive of Palestinians as a bunch of losers. And so, the very Koreans who still weep tears about Japanese brutality against their ancestors will glaze over the horror in Gaza. A society that makes young men feel they’re worthless for failing to pass exams to enter good schools and should just commit suicide is unlikely to feel much sympathy for the ‘loser’ Palestinians. In other words, half of Korean society is into extreme HBD nuttery while the other half, the rabid Christians, believe God chose the Jews to smite the Palestinians. Now, what about the Korean view of the US? During the Cold War, the official narrative was that (1) the US liberated the grateful Koreans from Japanese colonization and (2) saved at least the southern half from communist tyranny. Furthermore, it was under US protection and tutelage that South Korea developed into a powerhouse economy and eventually a democracy. There is no doubt some truth to these assertions. However, the US role in ‘liberating’ Korea was an accident of history as the US, for the most part, had endorsed the Japanese colonization of the peninsula as a civilizing mission(and also because the Japanese, while rooting out communist elements, allowed US Christian missionaries). Furthermore, the American idea of ‘liberating’ Korea was to divide it in half with the Soviet Union, with both sides installing puppet regimes who purged virtually all of the domestic opposition, thereby setting the grounds for the Korean War that ended up like WWIII concentrated on tiny territory, i.e. the Korean War within a year turned into Sino-US(and UN) War, a tragedy of epic proportions. Also, the price of South Korea’s economic rise was the collaboration with the US empire in the slaughter of millions in Vietnam. In other words, blood money. As for Korean politics, the US supported military dictatorships when advantageous to US interests and later realized weaponizing and spreading ‘democracy’(which is really a form of plutocracy and elitism that conjures up the illusion of popular will) was a far more effective way to infiltrate and control all aspects of Korean society. Koreans must also know of the US way of war, indiscriminately bombing entire cities and towns to feed the war profiteer machine, which the US would repeat in Vietnam and is now carrying out in Iran(and escalating, maybe even leading to the use of nukes). Furthermore, the Korean economy has been especially hit hard by the expanding war with Iran, but did the US consult with Korean leaders and elites? No, the US will sacrifice the well-being of anyone, even its allies, in the cuck-ritual of appeasing almighty Zion. Video Link In some ways, even more embarrassing is the case of Vietnam. Unlike Japan that played the imperialist game, lost to Uncle Sam, and became its bitch and unlike Korea that lacked inspired leadership that could meaningfully reunify the peninsula, Vietnam underwent titanic struggles against the French Empire and then against American neo-imperialism. As a result, it formed a truly sovereign nation-state unlike most ‘East Asian Tigers’ that, for all their economic growth, have been East Asian pussycats at the feet of Uncle Sam, now Uncle Shmuel. Vietnam’s struggle was epic and tragic, with countless killed or crippled by endless barrages of US bombing campaigns and with the southern half of the nation reduced to something like the Philippines, the whorehouse of Asia. Despite all the setbacks under communism and the renewal of relations and trade with the capitalist world, the Vietnamese can take pride in their attainment of a sovereign state at huge cost in human lives and environmental damage. So, why the silence of the lambs among the Vietnamese as well? Except for cursory official remarks, Vietnam appears to only care about its economic interests and has no concern for another civilization undergoing travails similar to those that once descended on Vietnam like a swarm of locusts. Fukuyama’s End-of-History isn’t only the end of ideology but the end of integrity, courage, and honor, with virtually all the world prioritizing its economic interests at the expense of all else. (Ironically, the US is the one entity that is willing to endanger its economic interests, not for the sake of higher ideals or humanitarianism but in the pursuit of JudeoNazi supremacist objectives. Of course, in the most cynical way the Zio-virus-infested US pretends to be attacking the ‘tyrannical regime’ in Iran to liberate the people there, but the mass targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructures says otherwise. The vile and shameless West will carry out any imperialist aggression and mass murder to appease the Jews while spouting ‘humanitarian’ platitudes meant for the most devious elements and dumbest morons. White cuck goyim are as willing to sacrifice white goyim as brown goyim to appease Jews as the rightful master race.) Now, the economic interests of any nation are understandable, but there are times when one rise above the occasion. And unlike the East Asian pussies and EU cuck-nations, Vietnam has less excuse to join in the silence of the lambs. It was among the nations that suffered most from US aggression, possibly the most. It suffered the full brunt of the war-profiteering US military machine. It was treated like a whore and kicked around like a servant. It struggled to the end and achieved what once seemed impossible. It gained a certain standing and respect in the world. Yet, when resurgent US imperialism is uglier than ever and nakedly motivated by racial supremacism(of Jews and their white cuck dogs), Vietnam has little to say to the world community lest Trump impose some more tariffs. Another sad sack is virtually all of Latin America. When the main theme of Yanqui-Latino relations was about the Anglo-American exploitation of the countries south of the border, there were plenty of Jews willing to expose and denounce gringo nastiness throughout the region. Also, many more Jews back then were sincerely on the socialist left and critical of capitalism as being joined at the hip with imperialism, especially in Latin America. But with the fading of true leftism among Jews(replaced by the fake ‘leftism’ of GloboHomo and other ‘cultural’ issues) and the Jewish takeover of the US, the main Jewish perspective on Latin America is Jewish hegemony over South as well as North America. Given the Jewish control of the Deep State, the media, and academia, the official and/or approved American policy toward Latin America has grown more aggressive, demanding, and gangsterist. If some Democrats in the past denounced American policy in Latin America, virtually all of them today cheered Trump’s attack on Venezuela. Democrats, like Republicans, are all about appeasing the Jews, and they knew Jews endorsed Trump’s action. There was once a time when such actions by Yanqui Imperialismo would have brought out the masses all over Latin America, but there is now mostly silence, the silence of the lambs. Latin America, corrupt, divided, inept, trashy, and/or degenerate, has no ideology or movement left. The only ‘resistance’ to US power comes from the utterly rotten drug cartels that rake in billions by poisoning the world. Over the years, given the economic growth and political progress, one would think Latin America would have become a bit more defiant against and independen
About
Freebook Plus
News
Cloud Hosting
FreeSky Social
Search
Community Guidelines
Get Support
Partnered News Sources
Free Movies
See All
English
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek